Udviklere: Karen A. Scherr, Angela Fagerlin, Lillie D. Williamson, J. Kelly Davis, Ilona Fridman, Natalie Atyeo, Peter A. Ubel

Udgivelsesår: 2016

Dato for sidste revision: 12 maj 2023

Indstilling, hvori værktøjet oprindeligt blev udviklet/valideret: Patients receiving diagnoses of early stage prostate and discussing their treatment options with a physician

Begrænsning til indstilling(er): Ingen

Målgruppe: Clinicians who are discussing treatment options directly with patients during clinic visits

Sprog): engelsk

Værktøjsemner:

Informationsgivning / informationsgivning / forklaring og planlægning

Specifikke konstruktioner/adfærd:

Recommendations

Datatyper, der kræves for at bruge værktøjet: Audio recordings, Transcripts

Påtænkt anvendelse: Uddannelse

Reference(r) til udviklings-/valideringspapir(er):

Validation:
Scherr, K. A., Fagerlin, A., Williamson, L. D., Davis, J. K., Fridman, I., Atyeo, N., & Ubel, P. A. (2017). The physician recommendation coding system (PhyReCS) a reliable and valid method to quantify the strength of physician recommendations during clinical encounters. Medical Decision Making, 37(1), 46-55.

Tool used in:
Scherr, K. A., Fagerlin, A., Hofer, T., Scherer, L. D., Holmes-Rovner, M., Williamson, L. D., ... & Ubel, P. A. (2017). Physician recommendations trump patient preferences in prostate cancer treatment decisions. Medical Decision Making, 37(1), 56-69.

Delaney, R. K., Sisco-Taylor, B. L., Wang, X., Scherr, K., Ubel, P. A., Haaland, B., ... & Fagerlin, A. (2022). Two Specialists, Two Recommendations: Discordance Between Urologists’& Radiation Oncologists’ Prostate Cancer Treatment Recommendations. Urology, 169, 156-161.

Værktøj/manual tilgængelig: Ja. (Codebook that can be adapted for other clinical settings from the website)

Værktøjsbeskrivelse af forfatteren:

The PhyReCS (physician recommendation coding system) provides a tool to systematically, reliably capture the strength of clinicians’ recommendation(s) towards or against multiple treatment options during a clinical encounter. It was developed in the context of early stage prostate cancer, a clinical context in which patients and clinicians engage in shared decision making to choose between multiple treatment potential options. Clinician recommendations are one of the strongest predictors of patient treatment choice, and it is important to be able to accurately capture clinician recommendations during clinical appointments. Once clinician recommendations are accurately captured, there are a number of important research questions that can be answered. For example, the PhyReCS has been used to examine predictors of patient treatment choice and compare urologist versus radiation oncologist recommendations for the same patient. The tool could be easily adapted to other clinical settings. No specific training is needed, but coders should undergo standard training for qualitative coding as outlined in the original validation paper.

Adgang: Offentlig

Kontakt: Karen Scherr